|
Welcome
Welcome to Valuation Insights — a complimentary
service presented quarterly to our friends in the
legal and consulting professions. We hope that you
will find the topics, articles, and court case abstracts
relevant, timely and informative.
SC&H Group is one of the fastest growing CPA and management consultant
firms in the country. We have been named to the Inside
Public Accounting Best of the Best list of America’s Top
CPA firms for nine years, and were recently named one
of the Top 100 Firms by Accounting Today.
With office locations in Maryland, Virginia, and Georgia,
SC&H has a national client base ranging from emerging
businesses to Fortune 500 companies. The firm’s
service offerings include business valuation, litigation
support, comprehensive accounting, tax and business
advisory services, and state and local tax services.
Please contact us if you would like additional information
on any of these topics or to discuss ways we may be
of assistance to you in your client matters.
Michael J. Young, CPA/ABV, CVA
Partner
(410) 403-1500
Over 26 years of experience; serves as expert
witness in litigation issues regarding economic
damages, valuation, and fraud matters.
Nathan E. DiNatale, CPA/ABV, CVA, CFE
Senior Manager
(410) 403-1500
Over 13 years of experience; focuses on business
valuations, financial reporting valuation issues,
litigation support and economic damage
calculations. Serves as expert witness in valuation
and litigation cases.
Can You Take it With You? Court Revisits Family Limited
Partnership Discounts
In the Matter of the Estate of Norman B. Hjersted, 2008 WL 269013 (Kansas)
February 1, 2008
In deciding the first incarnation of the Hjersted case in 2006, the Kansas Court of
Appeals held that discounts for lack of marketability and control did not apply to a family
limited partnership (FLP), particularly when its purpose was to disinherit Mr. Hjersted's
wife of nearly twenty years, to the benefit of of his son by a prior marriage. The son
appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court.
Click here for the full article
Back to top
Court Questions Expert's Objectivity, Methodology in
Reasonable Royalty Valuation
Bowling v. Hasbro, Inc., 2008 WL 717741 (U.S. Dist.)
March 17, 2008
Most attorneys understand how important it is that financial experts maintain
objectivity and support their conclusions with sound application of valuation standards
and methodology. They also realize the weaknesses that might open up in the other
side should an opposing expert fail to remain independent and/or analytically sound.
This new Daubert decision from the U.S. District Court (Rhode Island) serves as fair
warning for what happens when an the expert’s damages opinion lacks credibility on
both counts.
Click here for the full article
Back to top
IRS Expert Attacks Key Assumptions in Inflated Appraisal
KSP Investments, Inc. v. U.S., 2008 WL 182260 (U.S. Dist.)
January 17, 2008
In December 1999, the plaintiff retained a "Big 4" accounting firm to determine the fair
market value of an overseas waste-to-energy facility subject to a sale and leaseback
arrangement. Several years later, the IRS adjusted the plaintiff's 1999-2003 tax returns,
claiming that the plaintiff used the 1999 appraisal to inflate the purchase price of the
facility to obtain greater depreciation and interest deductions for the transaction.
Click here for the full article
Back to top
Finally, a Tax Court Considers a 'Good Facts' Family Limited
Partnership
Estate of Mirowski v. Comm’r, T.C. Memo. 2008-74
March 26, 2008
After a recent string of "bad facts" cases dealing with family limited partnerships
(FLPs) and limited liability companies (LLCs), the U.S. Tax Court delivered some relief to
taxpayers with this new case. Mirowski also provides a potential “roadmap” for good planning, funding, and presenting an FLP or similar entity, such as a limited liability
company, should it meet an IRS challenge under IRC §2036(a).
Click here for the full article
Back to top
Double-Dipping Rationale May Have Prompted Court To Prefer
Asset Approach
Wold v. Wold, 2008 N.D. 14 WL 183527
January 23, 2008
In valuing an oil services business for purposes of divorce, the wife's expert used an
income-based approach to arrive at a value of $640,000. The husband's expert used an
asset approach to value the business at $168,000. Without going into great detail
regarding these disparate conclusions, the trial court found that the husband's approach
was “much more logical as it relates to these facts and this business.”
Click here for the full article
Back to top
Working with Appraisers to Solve Problems in Valuing The Very
Small Business
Valuing the very small company can often be more challenging than valuing a large
firm or corporation. These types of valuations most commonly arise in the divorce
cases, although they also are frequently present in shareholder litigation, partnership
dissolutions, and similar litigation. Often, client budgetary restrictions are an overriding consideration. However, attorneys and appraisers can work together from the outset of
an engagement to meet client budgets and provide credible valuation. Here are a few
areas where communication and cooperation can be the most helpful.
Click here for the full article
Back to top
Forward This Newsletter
Unsubscribe From This Newsletter
By unsubscribing, you will no longer receive general e-mail communication from SC&H Tax & Advisory Services, LLC. This includes newsletters, event announcements, and general news and updates. |